Nowadays, communicating with others is faster and easier thanks to technology like email, cellular phones and beepers. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Today, with the strong development of science and technology in general and the internet in particular, there is much easier to communicate with others than just a decade ago. By using technological inventions such as FB, Instagram, people can easily interconnect and communicate with others in different countries or with modern transportations like trains, airplanes, people can meet more smoothly.
A decade ago, the only way for people to communicate with each other was to meet face to face or write letters. But there are many people living or working in different countries might be unable to meet. Meanwhile, sending a letter might take them four or five days to receive and during the period of sending, many letters were lost or misplaced. Moreover, the expenses of traveling and sending letters were extremely high if people lived too far from others. Besides that, we can only know people's lives in other countries through the news from the print newspaper, or the knowledge from books.
Nowadays, we are happy with the advance of new technologies such as email, smartphones, and beepers. People can talk with each other through mobile phones, chat through the Internet and send a message through e-mail or beeper if someone is not at home or in a different country. For example, a person in England can chat or call directly to his friend in France by facebook, viber, etc. Technology has indeed created an effective way for people to keep in touch with one another.
In addition, new technologies like television and the Internet helps us get information quicker and easier. For instance, if an earthquake occurs in any country, people in other different countries will hear about this news only a few hours later. Furthermore, people can read books or download music songs, movies, games, software, and pictures throughout the network. It is quite easy and cheap as some Internet web-sites are free for access.
In conclusion, it is true fact technological science has not only improved people's lives materialistically and mentally but also promoted interconnection, communication and the relationship between people and people around the world. In the coming year, we may hope to see an even greater number of new technologies are invested.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-05 | Shweta0059 | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-07 | mrmonsterhydra | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-07 | mrmonsterhydra | 78 | view |
- The world would be a better place if we all spoke the same language Do you agree 93
- Nowadays more and more personal vehicles pollute the environment Please list some causes and solutions 84
- Some people argue that it is important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a happy life Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Nowadays communicating with others is faster and easier thanks to technology like email cellular phones and beepers Has this change improved the way people live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- Many people in the undeveloped world die from diseases that are curable because they cannot afford the medication to treat themselves Do you believe that drug companies in the developed world should be obliged to make their products available at reduced p 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14905149051 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89044686148 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569105691057 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6978320925 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.764705882 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0588235294 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255270766316 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800334800395 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570165597881 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146446081844 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455343791422 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.