Some believe that people are naturally born as leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop.
It is often argued that whether leadership skills are naturally inherited, or it can be learned. In this essay I will discuss both opinions and give my personal opinion.
Starting with the belief of leadership gut is not something that can individuals learn, supporters of this belief often consider the fact that being a leader is something quite rare it has to be insight of a one from the start of his lifetime. They believe, it may be common to see many teachers on the streets, but this commonality does not applicable for leadership as (since) it is rare to find one of them. For instance, to become a prime minister of a certain country, nowhere in the globe people need specific education, in this sense many people could have been became a leader(leading figure) but since it is that easy as they need qualifications such as strong motivation and feeling of devotion on a cause which are highly related with one’s personality they argue true leaders are naturally born as who they are.
On the other hand, others argue leadership capabilities might develop throughout a time. I believe, giving solid soft and hard skills to an individual, guiding with qualified mentors and excellent education many ordinary beings might create a magnificent leader from themselves. This is because holding a good education and having correct people around are the most important elements in terms of becoming a leader. For example, the current secretary-general of the United Nations, he mentioned one of his previous interviews that he was a very shy and introvert kid. Having his big brother around as a diplomat influenced him, within the brother’s help and admitted to reputational schools he became the current leader of the UN.
To conclude, although having a material to become a leader is important I believe that providing a good education along with a strategic guidance anyone can become an influencer leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-29 | Tramtrr.21 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | Anonymous | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-06 | Harman97 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-24 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | phuong anh nguyen chin chin | 73 | view |
- Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed play them Do you agree or disagree with the statement 73
- a Four day workweek 60
- Shortage of Housing has given several social consequences Only the government who can solve the problems To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
... will discuss both opinions and give my personal opinion. Starting with the belief of leaders...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
... this sense many people could have been became a leaderleading figure but since it is...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 598, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have been became a leaderleading figure but since it is that easy as they need q...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, as to, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.015625 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86724327262 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56875 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.5796427582 49.4020404114 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.909090909 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0909090909 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240684671521 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860980147353 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701664433178 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134958572256 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00476428541354 0.056905535591 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.