People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
Humans have actually confronted more environmental issues today than ever before, and therefore, many opinions think that governments should push the cost of gasoline up so that we can mitigate these problems. While there are some benefits associated with this solution, I think that it is better if governments also carry out some other remedies apart from monetary approach.
On the one hand, governments can partially alliviate environmental problems by rising the cost of fuel on drivers. From an perspective of economy, drivers have to re-calculate the expenditure they have to spend compared to profit they gain. It is clear that if the cost of fuel becomes more expensive, they may have to decrease the amount of fuel. Consequently, governments can reduce the amount of emission being known as cause of ozone degradation and climate change. Furthermore, public budget obviously gains more profit from increase of fuel price. In practical way, authorities should allocate additional tax derived from fuel on researching alternative sources of energy which is more sustainable and renewable. For example, it is undoubted that many companies nowadays are manufacturing a variety of electric cars, which are more environmentally friendly than conventional vehicles.
On the other hand, if governments merely concentrate on the cost of fuel, they can not thoroughly solve environmental problems, so they should undertake many other approaches. Firstly, while emission from transportation is only one of main culprits which is responsible for greenhouse effect and climate change, humans have witnessed a significant amount of contaminants are originated from industrialisation. Governments should impose a policy of zero tolerance on companies and individuals who are found guilty of discharging chemical waste directly into the habitats. Secondly, high greening level also is one of the effective solutions that governments should be concerned. For example, national and local governments should raise awareness of the public to increase the number of trees on their areas and re-green denuded locations.
In conclusion, although I partially agree that increasing the cost of fuel is really a solution to solve environmental issues, I believe that governments should reduce emissions made from other sectors and plant more trees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- The diagram compares between the maps of single and double room study area. 61
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 78
- Students should pay the full cost for their own study because university education benefits individuals rather than society To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 62
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree about this opinion 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ising the cost of fuel on drivers. From an perspective of economy, drivers have to...
^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom other sectors and plant more trees.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60451977401 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14531500483 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562146892655 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3891947635 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.266666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1333333333 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318066851645 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107579807631 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769329423562 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210106631955 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326591434645 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.