The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The given line graph depicts the worldwide utilization of water in three different sectors in 19th century as well as the table represents the consumption of water in the year of 2000 in Brazil and Congo by farming and its population.
It can be seen that the farming sector was on the top to use water as a source from 1900 to 2000. However, water utilization by industries and people was lesser than agricultural use in the given time period. In 1900, industrial use and domestic use was almost same which is around 50 km3, while agriculture use was about more than ten times. Moreover, water use in industrial area and domestic use increased slightly till 2000, it is accounted by approximately 250 km3 and 1050 km3 respectively. Whereas, farming sector show a considerable changes in water usability in 2000 which is picked at 3000 km3.
In the term of water consumption in Brazil and Congo, the eye catching point is that the number of people in Brazil was very higher than Congo which is 176 millions while Congo had 5.2 millions population in the year of 2000. While, farming land area was larger in Brazil than the land area of irrigation in Congo. in Brazil, 359 m3 water consumed by a person while 8 m3 in Congo.
Overall, it is clear that the water was in very high use for agriculture and used by Brazil.
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e was almost same which is around 50 km3 , while agriculture use was about more th...
^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Moreover
...ulture use was about more than ten times,Moreover, water use in Industrial area and Domes...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tely 250 km3 and 1050 km3 respectively. Whereas, farming sector show a considerable cha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...eas, farming sector show a considerable changes in water usability in 2000 which is pic...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...n the land area of irrigation in Congo. in Brazil, 359 m3 water consumed by a pers...
^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter was in very high use for agriculture and used by Brazil.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73402185604 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504273504274 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.0946717863 43.030603864 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 156.0 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4285714286 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252819169142 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138585734541 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744325420834 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178188778406 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769378535048 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.