"According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."
In these meme, the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company recommends to allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising and to create awareness among them so as to make them understanding regarding the availability of good quality of their movies in the market. To bolster the recommendation, the advertising director cites the following facts; even though the percentage of the reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually escalated during the past year but the contents of these reviews are actually not reaching enough to their specified viewers. Hence, they concluded that the problems not lies with their quality of their movies but with the public's lacks of awareness regarding their good quality of films. Close scrutiny of each these facts however reveals that none of them lend no credible evidence to bolster their recommendation.
First, the argument readily assumes that making good quality will definitely increased the craze of the viewer towards their films. Aside from the good quality films, there must be appropriate co-actors inside the film which make its completely. So, before producing movies by the company, at first the highly professional actors and actress should be appointed to make the people allured towards the movies. Therefore, the author fails to mention the appropriate reasons regarding the less attendance of people in Super Screen.
Second, the argument fails to mention the reasonable condition regarding the less viewership towards the films produced by their company. Allocating huge budget for the advertisements in order to buttress the contents present inside the movies manufactured by them doesn't sound reliable. Hence, before doing surplus advertisements, the choice of general public in the market should be noticed and thereby, appropriate films should be designed. Therefore, the argument provides no viable evidence to support the recommendation.
Finally, the argument fails to mention one of the key factors on the basis of which it could have been evaluated, only evaluating the percentage of positive reviews received from the past years doesn't manifest the positive aspect of the production company. Therefore, in order to allure general public towards the company, its production techniques and capability should be studied. Similarly, at the same time, what sorts of people who are involved on production sites should be also noted. Hence, the argument remains unsubstantiated and becomes open to debate.
In sum, the argument relies on dubious assumption which renders as convincing as it stands. To bolster the recommendation, the advertising director must provide lucid evidence perhaps by local study or survey; the technical aspects of the company should be studied and improved as soon as possible, different highly dignified veterans actors and actress should be chosen to escalate the production and before spending excessive amount on advertisements, the choice of people should be notified. To better assess the recommendation, I would need to know why less people are visiting the Super Screen Movie Company and what sorts of technicalities are present in the market which can boost the production.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 16 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Mizanur_Rahman | 50 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | tedyang777 | 60 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | barath002 | 58 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 83
- Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 50
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach 58
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 83
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 66
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 504 350
No. of Characters: 2698 1500
No. of Different Words: 234 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.738 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.353 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.799 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 222 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 161 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 107 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 66 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.526 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.763 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.737 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.324 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.324 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this meme' or 'these memes'?
Suggestion: this meme; these memes
In these meme, the advertising director of the Super ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommends allocating'.
Suggestion: recommends allocating
...e Super Screen Movie Production Company recommends to allocate a greater share of its budget next year...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...sing and to create awareness among them so as to make them understanding regarding the a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 794, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: Scrutiny
... regarding their good quality of films. Close scrutiny of each these facts however reveals tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...hat making good quality will definitely increased the craze of the viewer towards their f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...te co-actors inside the film which make its completely. So, before producing movies...
^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... inside the movies manufactured by them doesnt sound reliable. Hence, before doing sur...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...g surplus advertisements, the choice of general public in the market should be noticed and th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts, the choice of general public in the market should be noticed and thereby, ap...
^^
Line 4, column 195, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ve reviews received from the past years doesnt manifest the positive aspect of the pro...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... company. Therefore, in order to allure general public towards the company, its production tec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 557, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ecommendation, I would need to know why less people are visiting the Super Screen Mo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, regarding, second, similarly, so, therefore, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 55.5748502994 140% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 16.3942115768 159% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2751.0 2260.96107784 122% => OK
No of words: 502.0 441.139720559 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48007968127 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87760087852 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 204.123752495 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480079681275 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 850.5 705.55239521 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.76447105788 148% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.22255489022 261% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.5131648189 57.8364921388 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.789473684 119.503703932 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4210526316 23.324526521 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.70786347227 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.25449101796 228% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216919565272 0.218282227539 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640440572056 0.0743258471296 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831383862752 0.0701772020484 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11365496748 0.128457276422 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616508747539 0.0628817314937 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.3799401198 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.3550499002 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.5979740519 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 98.500998004 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.5 12.3882235529 238% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.