Some people think that investment in education is the most effective way to develop a nation.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
In recent year, education has been receiving a great deal of public attention. While some people believe that developing the country by investing in education is a very effective solution, I would argue that other factors should also not be discouraged.
On the one hand, education is the major contributor to the thriving of a nation. Firstly, larger expenditure on education could boost production, healthcare quality, transportation and all other aspects of life. For example, increases in subjects about electrical and computer allows the creation of a wide range of machines that can replace humans with greater efficiency and productivity. Secondly, by allocating on education, the governments would create more highly trained intellectual workforce. This leads to the driving force pushes the country forward. If countries refuse to invest in education, the country will increasingly go down.
On the other hand, other sector such as economic is equally important. First, a healthy economy leads to job creation, higher levels of employment and better income for all citizens. Moreover, economic progress ensures that there is more money for governments to spend on infrastructure and public services. For example, a government with a higher revenue might invest in its country's transportation network, education system, and hospitals. Therefore, the countries would increasingly thrive.
In conclusion, the education is obviously a key marker of a country’s success, but other sectors are equally significant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-19 | sharanbhullar | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n subjects about electrical and computer allows the creation of a wide range of m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 229.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68558951965 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12036769805 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637554585153 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2187580827 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3571428571 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132268132314 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431321118459 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515458148892 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853545371297 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551683827108 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.