Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In todays innovative world, technology has become an indispensable part of human life. Few masses advocate strong points on efficacy of modern gadgets to enhance one's social circle, while many other claim it as a hindrance on the way of social connectivity. This essay will emphasize on various reasons why both sides are important for benefit of society. According to my opinion, although technology helps in strengthening social ties, it can't overtake traditional ways of physical presence in bringing people much closer.
As per the first aspect, technology has played a vital role in bringing the world together globally. No matter how far a person resides, everyone can come together just on a click from mobile or tablet. Moreover, in this busy world where its really difficult to meet our dear ones on regular basis, technology has brought all on a common platform to share face to face interaction. For instance, development of many social apps such as WhatsApp, Facebook, skype has got huge success in mitigating social distances among masses at global levels. So, it is undeniable fact that modern technology has emerged as a crucial part in connecting people together.
Looking at the other side, the value of physical presence can't be ignored in strengthening social relations. More dependency on electronic gadgets to reach the loved ones has impacted the depth of true emotions and feelings which one can feel only by coming together physically. For example, occasions become memorable by sitting and enjoying them together rather than sending wishes from technological ways. Hence, to create happy families and healthy circles traditional ways of connecting together should not be forgotten.
To conclude, technology has become part and parcel of human's daily life. Invaluable contribution of advanced technology on our social life is viewed both positively and negatively by different sectors. As per my view, old ways of welcoming social connections should be as valuable as role of technology in binding them together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-07 | ieltsstudent | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | ieltsstudent | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-15 | Hoang Minh | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-02 | pris | 95 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | sanimergill | 67 | view |
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 78
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 84
- Ownership of mobile phones has risen dramatically in recent years despite the potentially harmful effects they may have on your health and on society Governments should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile phones to those who need them for t 84
- The table compares international tourism in 2009 and 2010 in 9 countries 62
- The table below gives information about the employment sectors in which people from three age groups worked 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... helps in strengthening social ties, it cant overtake traditional ways of physical p...
^^^^
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
... helps in strengthening social ties, it cant overtake traditional ways of physical p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...er side, the value of physical presence cant be ignored in strengthening social rela...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, look, moreover, really, so, then, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31481481481 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84529067273 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617283950617 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4516467225 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126012262926 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420468457732 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355324455849 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804310560537 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277884990691 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.