The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication by many however there are some who would argue that it is actually destroying our communication skills.
Discuss both view points and give your opinion.
Internet has taken Mammoth dimensions in the every aspect of human life, specially in the communication, ever since the globalisation took place. A section of society considers it a positive turn while others are more suspicious about its repercussions owning to several reasons. This essay shall elucidate both the perspectives in ensuing fragments along with my personal slant.
First and foremost benefit of Internet in terms of communication is that it is efficient method which saves energy and time. To be more precise, gone are the days when people had to visit their kith and kin in order to talk to them and sent letters which is a time consuming process. While in this era of technology, they can make audio and video calls with the single click. They can send emails as well and that is matter of few seconds. As such, people, living at far away places do not feel homesickness and get emotional support from their family and friends via social sites.
However, internet communication has deteriorated communication skills as masses have reduced their visiting terms which is most efficient way of communication. To illustrate, due to social sites individuals meet one another rarely and cannot learn respecting others and welcoming skills. Hence, they do formalities by indulging in technological interaction. As a result, talking traits get affected. What is more, one cannot learn speaking full of confidence through internet. In this case, when people become habitual of talking to others through technology instead of face to face conversation. They have less confidence to present their views in front of group. Consequently, it forces them to take a back seat in society.
To recapitulate, after analysing both the viewpoints I vehemently vouch that although internet works as panacea for the people who live in different nations and have less time for visiting terms yet, it somewhere is responsible for destroying communication skills. Therefore, only wise use of internet communication is commendable and one should not make it an interference in their communication traits which may be hazardous for them in long run and makes them less acceptable in the modern society.
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What are the reasons for doing this Is it a negative or positive development 89
- most people accept that we live in a globalised world but not everyone agrees that is this is beneficial to what extent is globalisation of positive or negative development 84
- These days some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events Do you think this is a positive or negative development 92
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 56
- Many people think that the government should spend money to explore life in the outer space while others think that it's a waste of public money. Discussscuss both views and include your own opinion and examples. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to respect'.
Suggestion: to respect
...eet one another rarely and cannot learn respecting others and welcoming skills. Hence, the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to speak'.
Suggestion: to speak
...ffected. What is more, one cannot learn speaking full of confidence through internet. In...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20903954802 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98569797802 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601694915254 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8157994554 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.444444444 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133063776844 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337977899782 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474696283967 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744358018164 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466026084975 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.