Schools have a limited amount of money to spend. Some people suggest that it should be spent on good teachers, while others say it should be used for buying equipment like computers. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is known that schools have scarce funds, which shouldbe used wisely. On one side of the argument, there are those who believe that thesefinances should be allocated to computerizing of educational institutions. Asopposed to them there are number of people who propose to use mentioned fundsfor highly professional teaching staff. In this essay, I will consider bothsides of the argument and then I will give my own opinion.
Firstly, some people consider that it may be reasonableto allocate school’s funds to purchase of modern technologies such ascomputers, interactive whiteboards and other equipment. This point of view canbe justify by the idea that schooling must keep up-to-date and as well as this,modern technologies make an educational process more interactive and interesting.As a result, school-children are engaged more in lessons and level of academic performanceis growing up.
However, there are those who argue that finances haveto be spent on high-end teaching personnel. They would probably support theiropinion by the fact that the high level of education is not achievable withoutgood teachers. This is because professional qualities of an educator play a significantrole in quality of education. Therefore, a good teacher may encourage studentsto learn a subject more deeply and thoroughly as well as being a good modelrole for them. For example, I used to hate geometry until that moment when anew mathematics teacher was hired for our class. The teacher was such enthusiasticabout the subject that he was able to lead me by personal example and geometryhas become my favorite subject since then.
In conclusion, having considered both sides if theargument, I think that the budget should be allocated equally between teachingstaff and electronic equipment. This is because both of them are equally importantfor educational process. It is hard to imagine that computers can replaceteachers and to be as effective as them. However, it would be difficult for teachersto provide a competitive level of education without the equipment in the modernreality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-12 | Mariamirabella | 96 | view |
- Around the world it is likely that more adults will work from home and more children will study from home as computer technology becomes cheaper and more accessible Do you think it is a negative or a positive development 74
- People doing dangerous sports like bungee jumping and scuba diving should be responsible for their own life and rescue workers should not risk their live people.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some believe that people who do physical work should be paid on par with the people who have high level degree Do you agree or disagree 76
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits to living in cities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , modern
...must keep up-to-date and as well as this,modern technologies make an educational proces...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...rocess more interactive and interesting.As a result, school-children are engaged m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5375 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35130571569 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5111373857 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.75 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251634142417 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745918298971 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453067105785 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142702668092 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322063762809 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.