Some poeple think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
University is a place where most people conduct their dreams, has opened a new world for students. However, there is an argument between two ideas, one believes that students should choose their interest subjects, whereas others consider that studying useful subjects which serve their job in the future should be allowed. From my point of view, I suppose that we need to concentrate on the subjects helping our work rather than study whatever we desire.
On the one hand, some people support the idea of chosen interested subjects freely. The reason is students are appealed, so they can spend all their time and enthusiasm to focus on one issue. In this freestyle of studying, learner's creativity is stimulated more effectively, sometimes, they will make a breakthrough in their field. Besides, students are excited to seek the information positively, transfer it into their knowledge, therefore they feel more comfortable without limitation, and remember faster and longer. Those reasonable explanations solidify an above outlook.
On the other hand, the opposite point of view considers that university should allow students to study subjects which make a fundamental knowledge for their field in the future. This method of studying will provide an overall view of their future career, help them avoid making mistakes and orientate a proper way to reach the goal. For example, in the field of science and technology, math is always a perplexing subject in which all students try to avoid it, however, numerical appearance is in every piece of life, even in the art which closely related to ratios. In addition, if students have a perception of essential things to learn, they will save a lot of their time and not be distracted by unuseful subjects.
There are several ways how to study at the university, the freestyle way is choosing their interesting subjects, while another is a systematic method. I advocate the second idea which allows students to learn useful subjects for their future.
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 92
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six different areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that school children should no be given homework by their teacher whereas others argue homework plays an important role in the education of children Discuss both view and give your own opinion 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the type of relationships people make Has this become positive or negative development 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which maybe unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the main information by reporting and selecting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'fundamental knowledge'.
Suggestion: fundamental knowledge
...w students to study subjects which make a fundamental knowledge for their field in the future. This met...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, i suppose, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16307692308 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70428106799 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590769230769 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1693560425 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292662161616 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946722656778 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629182610005 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173973928713 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669553154062 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.