Modern appliances in the home have become more common, leaving no doubt that advances in technology have improved our lifestyle. Do you agree or disagree.
With the advent of technology, it can be seen that innovation of modern gadgets have resulted in enhancing comfort level in daily human activities. Few believe in the remarkable efficacy of new life-changing developments, while many others advocate about adverse effects it can have on the overall health of an individual due to increased dependency on these automated machines. However, I am at accord with the given statement and think that miraculous results due to various automations are a boon in today's fast-paced lifestyle, despite few drawbacks which can be grappled intelligently.
Although some people are concerned about its adversities in terms of health and employment loss for low-income group, still enormous benefits of living a tech advanced life is irrefutable. In this competitive world, the work sector is demanding to such an extent that managing work-life balance becomes a challenge. For instance, due to hectic schedule, one hardly finds time to spend with their loved ones. So, in order to achieve a healthy relation with kids, technological gadgets come at rescue to provide plenty of time for strengthening family bonds.
In addition, to gain financial security both the partners are expected to be employed in modern times. In such situation, if one has to manage work manually at home can lead arguments among family members. For example, higher rate of divorce cases are due to household management duties. Hence, automated machines help in mitigating the impact of such issues.
To conclude, Nowadays modern inventions have become an indispensable part of human day to day activities. Implication of these advancements has proved to be a reward for the whole mankind. As per my opinion, in order to become a multitasker by saving huge time and to maintain harmonious relation with family, one can rely completely on the development of these advanced gears.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-04 | geetuvirk09 | 70 | view |
| 2020-04-13 | pris | 93 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | Stanleyjohnt | 87 | view |
| 2018-06-01 | kaka singh | 85 | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters traveling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 78
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011 62
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 The bar chart shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 84
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children Discuss both the views and give your own opinion 89
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctivities. Few believe in the remarkable efficacy of new life-changing developmen...
^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emanding to such an extent that managing work-life balance becomes a challenge. F...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, still, then, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29801324503 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98443398167 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635761589404 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5708232409 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10228530495 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343073812279 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342221111492 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626060169147 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348761370652 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.