The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers,
artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people
I definitely agree with the statement that the clear indicator of a great nation is assessed by the well-fare of its people, not science or powerful weapon.
The purpose of constructing a nation is to take care of its people and bring happiness to them. For instance, Taiwan has created a lot of policies for health caring to take care of people. One of them is health insurance for every Taiwanese so that they can see a doctor with little cost. If everyone affords to see a doctor, then people are likely to be healthier and live longer. Thus, even Taiwan is small in terms of the area of a country, people could live with happiness and show greatness.
Naysayers may argue that many great achievements as indicators showing the strength of a nation made by rulers for powerful weapons and left their name in history. However, these powerful weapons, like nuclear bombs, are developed at the expense of the economy and sacrificing the economy is going to draw the welfare of its people. For instance, the dictator of North Korea, Kim Jong-Un has ruled his nation and show great military power with nuclear weapons at the expense of the economy. He has spent almost all of budget on military and left his people suffering, hungry and even dying. Thus, the judgment of potency of a nation should not consider military achievement as a key factor, but a personal achievement instead.
Additionally, Opponents claim that technologies and science are one of the most indicators to show potent of a nation. It is true that they evolve human society and improve the quality of life in many ways, however, the purpose of these improvements has always been making a contribution to people. For instance, spacing exploring, an advanced country like United State, using spacing exploring to expand our knowledge to the universe. But the main motivation of it is to identify or predict if any hazard that could be detrimental to people on earth in the future. To be specific, using the space telescope to see if any huge comet that will collide with the earth and cause a disaster. Therefore, rather saying them as indicators of a potent nation, they're just tools to promote the welfare of people, the ultimate purpose of science and technologies are used to benefit people of a country.
In conclusion, the well-being of people is definitely the surest indicator to show how the potency of a nation. Technologies and science are just used to promote it, not an indicator. Powerful weapons and military are of ruler’s personal achievement, instead of a point to assess the greatness of a nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-01 | student193044 | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Jhon Kwame | 50 | view |
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Ce 77
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 70
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework whereas in the district of Marlee most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no mo 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership 54
- Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed Reading Course has greatly improved productivity One graduate of the course was able to read a 500 page report in only two hours another graduate rose from an a 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 752, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
... them as indicators of a potent nation, theyre just tools to promote the welfare of pe...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2148.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83783783784 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7045114068 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477477477477 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4329179103 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.4 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258527899546 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789682074458 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665088169926 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165993123755 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696733359369 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.