Establishing good relationships in the workplace is not important, as the primary goal of every person is to focus on work.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Close interpersonal relationships have always been a key to the success for thousands of staff in all countries. However, some people believe that the only significant purpose during the working hours is to concentrate on the targets. Although the mission of the employees is to complete their tasks, no one should forget about the atmosphere in the team.
On the one hand, all problems could be solved more rapidly without the distraction, which comes from chatting of the colleagues during their working hours. Undoubtedly, conversations take away the time, that might have been used for improving the working skills or developing of the company. Also, operating with several breaks interrupts a proper functioning and prolongs the office hours. For example, one famous psycholinguist advises not to suspend the activity until its completion in order not to avoid loss of the concentration. Thus, responsible staff should clearly follow the guidelines of the manager to ensure smooth work of the enterprise.
On the other hand, people generally spend in their offices nearly 160 hours during a month, so without any communications the weekdays will turn routine. Moreover, an unanimous team is able to find a solution together without wasting time on searching of the unknown data. Finally, these employees, according to the similar interests and passions, may exchange experience and improve their professional knowledge. For example, in the office of Google there is only an open air space, where all workers resolve the targets and share their ideas. In other words, sometimes good relations in the office is beneficial not only for the specialization of the team, but also for the firm.
To conclude, the head of any business or a public organization should care about the labor capacity, however the importance of humans’ contact in the productivity of the staff cannot be denied.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-10 | swasthani | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-13 | sssssse | 63 | view |
| 2021-03-16 | fowzan | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-24 | katenokk84 | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-19 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 11 | view |
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should read only those books that are about real events real people and established facts Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion 70
- Despite a large number of gyms a sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world What problems are associated with this What solutions can you suggest 70
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Fossil fuels are essential for producing electricity powering industry and fueling transportation However one day we will reach a point when all the world s fossil fuels have been depleted How can we conserve these resources What are some alternatives to 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e weekdays will turn routine. Moreover, an unanimous team is able to find a soluti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29470198675 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91171086696 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609271523179 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.9974488381 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.214285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0529321067489 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0180742109099 0.084324248473 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0158716417165 0.0667982634062 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.032646029191 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154755275691 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.