The bar chart below gives information about five countries spending habits of shopping on consumer goods in 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates how much money four different countries, namely Belguim, Spain, Australia, and Britain, spent on six consumer products in 2012.
It is clear that while Britain was the biggest spender in all six categories among the nation compared in the bar chart, the opposite was true for Belguim. It is also noticeable that the amount of money allocated for toys, books, and cameras by these four nations was far higher than that of the remaining products.
In 2010, Britons spent a larger amount of money on toys, at around 168 thousand pounds, and cameras, at exactly 170 thousand pounds than the other products, as compared to that of Australians, at 168 and 165 thousand pounds, respectively. Meanwhile, outdoor game accessories gain the least popularity in Australia, at a shy of 145 thousand pounds, which was 10 thousand pounds lower than the figure of Britain, at over 155 thousand pounds.
Turning to the remaining two countries, while toys and cameras were the most popular consumer goods in Spain, at around 155 thousand pounds each, the similar trend could be seen for outdoor game accessories in Belguim, at approximately 150 thousand pounds. By contrast, 145 thousand pounds was distributed to buy books in Belguim, which was the least spent product in this country, Spain paid the least attention to console games, at 150 thousand pounds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | nhunnnnn | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | nhunnnnn | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | vnquynhhh | view | |
| 2021-05-12 | phuongphuong | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-21 | nguyen duc tri | 11 | view |
- The bar chart below gives information about five countries spending habits of shopping on consumer goods in 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Transport delays and long journey times are a widespread phenomenon in many cities today What are the causes of this problem and how could the situation be improved 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07522123894 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62614626715 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535398230088 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.2697194734 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.857142857 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2857142857 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0377515150419 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0255223536886 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350931137359 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0377978731328 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375881337921 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.