The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
The line graph gives information about changes in the price of three different types of food and beverage: fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks from 1979 to 2009. It also shows the overall trend in the consumer-price index over a thirteen-year period. In general, there was an increase in four lines during 30 years
Over the period, both price changes for sugar and sweets, and consumer-price index witnessed a similar trend. In 1979, these two lines had the same starting figure at approximately 60 percent, followed by a steady increase to 100 percent in 1984. Thereafter, price changes in sugar and sweets rose steeply to 200 percent in 2009, compared to 210 percent in the consumer-price index. After remaining the same from 1988 to 2002, the price of soft drinks reached its highest point at roughly 150 percent in the final year
It is clear that there was a considerable rise in fresh fruits and vegetables price changes. It started at nearly 60 percent in 1979, then fluctuated dramatically until peaking at 330 percent in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2022-03-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | yanping | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | madina6369 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 78
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 95
- Many people believe that formal pen and paper examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement What is your view of examinations 84
- Convenience food will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The graph below compares in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99444444444 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77721660998 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605555555556 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7969997294 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.428571429 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278204436802 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130214962063 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974227107856 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186080280083 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481859135391 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.