A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
I believe that a nation should encourage all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college, but not force them to do it. Since not all students have talent or interest in academy, some of them prefer vocational courses to academic courses.
The same national curriculum helps students explore their interest and give a comprehensively basic knowledge before college. For instance, in Taiwan, before college, there are three years in a row of senior high school courses and every high school students have to take all kinds of courses, like literature, math, physics, chemistry and biology in the first year. The material covers wide range, but basic knowledge. Starting from 2nd year, pupils have to decide which separation they could like to join, like literature, engineering and medicine specific group. Therefore, students could have opportunities to investigate all majors in their first year and then decide in 2nd year. This help students clarify their interest and assess the next step before entering college as well.
The naysayers may argue that the cost is high for every school to execute the same nation curriculum. Indeed, the cost of the implementation is relatively high, because every school has to recruit counterpart faculties and prepare the material as well. Some small school may not be able to carry out the policy. In rural area, some high-school has only 30 students per year, they are barely to perform the same curriculum as other schools in urban area. Still, the condition could be improved by collaborating with other schools. For instance, this literature school could collaborate with engineering school and provide the comprehensive courses as a whole. As a result, the strategy could help schools with insufficient resource to carry out the policy.
Not all of students are apt to participate the same courses, even before college. For those who are not interested in academic, they probably have the clear target of what they want to at very early stage. Or they have talent in non-academic field. To be more specific, some students like to fix cars or do hair cutting. For instance, In Taiwan, there are some vocational schools which are appropriate for these students to join. The vocational schools are beneficial to students, because they could help students develop skills that could applied to jobs directly. Consequently, they could make contribution to the society after graduation.
In conclusion, the government should encourage students to participate the same national curriculum, not force them to do it. In the meanwhile, schools could collaborate together to perform adequate resource and material. And the government should offer vocational schools as other options for those who are likely to go to vocational field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 59
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon On the other hand conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible First atmospheric pre 80
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 58
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College a private institution to the college s governing committee We recommend that Grove College preserve its century old tradition of all female education rather t 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[6]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'comprehensively basic knowledge'.
Suggestion: comprehensively basic knowledge
...tudents explore their interest and give a comprehensively basic knowledge before college. For instance, in Taiwan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, of course, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2359.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 450.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24222222222 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77177039293 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.217886568 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.36 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301606490869 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918180978473 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138950229408 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216774529402 0.150359130593 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149206608929 0.0667264976115 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.