Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
The statement argues that after five years all those in power in any field should be step down, the reason being new leadership only can lead the enterprises to the surest path of success. Many of us will argue it will hold all the time, while others will counter this. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the statement and will provide sound reasoning for the same.
The powerful person should step down or not after five years is a debatable issue because in some condition it is necessary for the leader to continue and some conditions it will be a win-win situation for everyone if their leader would step down, for example, in Pakistan PM Imran Khan is not able to control or work effectively to dissuade the terrorism, bring out people from poverty, not able to take effective measure for their feeble economy, so If he steps down from his position and some other person take his person with the caliber and have a maverick mind to make Pakistan a great country then it will good for all the person living in Pakistan.
However, as we all know that experience is the best teacher than how could you expect from someone, that he/she will change the current situation. According to me, five is too less to judge someone or for someone to show their caliber and if the condition is too bad in any field that it will make difficult to judge, for example, in India, about 33 percentage of the total population(130 billion) is living below the poverty line and if the except their leader that he will bring out all of them from poverty within the tenure of the five year than it is next to impossible, the leader will require few more year or 2 or 3 decades also to make this happen.
Last but not the least, if somebody is doing a great job in his field and giving you an extra-ordinary result, then it makes no sense to remove that person after five years. By doing so, you will not only lose a great leader but a heavy loss to the organization.
Thus, in my view, the surest path to success for any enterprise isn't revitalization through new leadership. In fact, this is the best way to review a diminishing or a crumbling enterprise and not an established business, political, or government field.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 62
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
- Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number 82
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 148, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
.../she will change the current situation. According to me, five is too less to judge someone or f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 65, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...rest path to success for any enterprise isnt revitalization through new leadership. ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iness, political, or government field.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, thus, while, for example, in fact, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52605459057 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46188112959 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511166253102 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 23.0359550562 174% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 187.105879117 60.3974514979 310% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 182.4 118.986275619 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.3 23.4991977007 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301973500621 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133763739464 0.0831039109588 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164333857002 0.0758088955206 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178086288306 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110682803002 0.0667264976115 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 14.1392134831 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.8 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 11.2143820225 161% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.