Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?
In many parts of the world today, more folks have concerned about technology. It is hypothesized that there will probably be more sabotages if various modern machines which replace manual work at home spontaneously reinforce these days. This essay attempts to point out that this statement is quite persuadable.
There have been more folks who are in favor of the view. First and foremost, people in all probability gain more risks of health. This can be fathomed that global folks have tended to be bone idle currently, so they have not been intrigued in doing sports in order to thrive their fitness. It is obvious that housework deems to be activities which can render aids for people to do some exercises. Therefore, people will obtain diverse detrimental impacts on their health if they depend on these facilities. A case in this point, in VNN articles, the figure for children who have been obese skyrocketed these days after markets of technology thrived in some years ago. Another possibility is that dwellers will probably meet some obstacles in some spectacles. This means that they cannot work independently in some prospects if they sustain leaning on these gadgets. Concretely, some people would not have adequate abilities to tackle housework if they lived in new environments: work abroad or occasional trips. Indeed, these issues have been clearly demonstrated in lives of most international students who have determined to study overseas. Furthermore, revenues of citizens will be ultra sabotaged due to these tactics. It is reluctant for citizens to invest or maintain these elements. As highlight for this point, following CNN channel, most inhabitants in the globe have determined to cease utilizing machines at home due to costs. Consequently, they can have scope to reinforce their incomes in order to invest beneficial sides in lieu of these superfluous aspects.
Vice versa, opposing points of the theme cannot be rejected by some factors. One of them is that folks can have more incentives to gain some positive perception after work. It can be understood that employees these days have to have various burdens on their shoulders due to work, so they can perceive stressful work at home after working hours. It deems to be better if modern tactics can be applied so that people can alleviate their thoughts or ideology. In fact, the reason why people have gone for these methods owing to aforementioned ideas.
In brief, drawbacks of this theme cannot be valued due to facts. However, the advantages of them ought to be regarded strictly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-14 | harmankaur1203 | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-11 | khoa.d.le08 | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-11 | khoa.d.le08 | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-11 | khoa.d.le08 | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | Babal | 56 | view |
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What is the reason for doing this Is this a negative or positive development 56
- Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on their planets and messages should be sent to contact them Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times even on holidays Does this development have more advantage than disadvantages 67
- Some people think that computer skills should be made as fourth skill in education To what extent do you agree 67
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicines Government funding should reflect this 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, in brief, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0973871734 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73279122676 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527315914489 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.645802893 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4166666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5416666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54166666667 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153234326485 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535928192596 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046479300075 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137239221172 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043255690117 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.