Student today can access the information online so libraries are not necessary To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The approach to knowledge nowadays is far more straightforward thanks to the significant growth of the internet and libraries are believed to be unnecessary. While the merits of the online information are undeniable, libraries are still playing an essential role in the academic field
On the one hand, there is a variety of advantages that online information bring. To begin with, it is the most diverse source of information. It is irrefutable that none of the bibliothecas existing in the real world can accommodate a greater amount of information when compared to its counterpart in the cyberspace. Furthermore, by encrypting and uploading to the digital library, people can storage most of humanity's precious knowledge without concerning about it being lost and ruined as a consequence of time, warfare or natural catastrophe. Another benefit of accessing information online is originating from its convenient and effortlessness to approach. By the way of illustration, commuting to the library is no longer needed when a pupil can acquire knowledge wherever they want as long as it is connected to the internet.
Nevertheless, the importance of physical libraries should not be underestimated. In the first place, it is a perfect place to absorb knowledge. There seem to be shreds of evidence that numerous students learn much more efficient in the traditional library than in the virtual ones since the later reportedly had various distractions. The social network, which discouraged the pupil from emphasizing on studying, can be a suitable case in point. Secondly, the information contained in traditional libraries is more reliable. This is shown by these kinds of knowledge are undergone various rigorous inspections with the aim of eliminating false information before having a slot at the library. It prevents students from bewilderment when reading misinformation
To sum up, the benefit of the digital source is undeniable since it is a convenient and effective means of accessing information and it is also used as absolute safety storage. However, the traditional library still has its own strength such as students are less likely to be distracted and can have a more reliable source of knowledge
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-01 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-06 | Manjinder_kaur | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-06 | Manjinder_kaur | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-06 | Manjinder_kaur | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-06 | Manjinder_kaur | 56 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 57
- Many people today especially in the developed world are choosing to have fewer children or none at all Why is this happening and do you think it is a good trend 73
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 67
- An increased number of people today change their career and living places in their lives Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, while, such as, by the way, to begin with, to sum up, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35428571429 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25758894188 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548571428571 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6388757697 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.933333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1988788756 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644147246441 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442786721803 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122888740103 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016103320481 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.