Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People now can better protect the environment than they could in the past.
Human beings by selfish actions are disturbing ecological balance everywhere, and create serious environmental problems such as global warming or rising sea levels; consequently, for greater protection, we must tackle them before it become too late. In the last decades, people have made a lot of endeavours to mitigate these harmful activities on the environment, and some of them were highly effective, for instance the total ban on using CFCs -Chlorofluorocarbon- or the dramatic reduction in using coal; however, I believe that nowadays people can better protect it due to having more detailed environmental information, more advanced equipment to conserve it, and more facilities to inform the other about environmental issues.
To began with, approaches which are adopted to environmental protection wouldn’t highly effective unless they based on the in-depth knowledge of the environment; as a result; nowadays, due to deeper understanding of environment, better environmental conservation can be conducted. In fact, researchers are keeping a closer watch on the environment that provide additional valuable information, which certainly culminate in better protection than before. Furthermore, nowadays humans have more perception of ties that bind creatures’ lives into each other, a far better understanding of irreversible damage to environment, and also a better sensation of emissions that breed climate change; hence; I think this considerable knowledge may engender kinder treatments to the environment.
Secondly, in addition to having a thorough knowledge, nowadays people can protect environment in a more efficient way owing to developments in technology. In fact, not only do these developments help the better observation of the universe, but they also present more effective treatment and waste disposal. In fact, nowadays humans via sophisticated cameras can precisely measure the amount of greenhouse gases, then observe how its negative influence deplete the ozone layers. They can also use clever devices for sewage treatment, producing biofuels from organic waste, and highly efficient recycling; consequently, I believe that they can better conserve the environment than before.
Last but not least, nowadays, it’s easier to make collective efforts to preserve the environment. Nowadays, people will be keeping informed as the latest news from environmental problems develop, so it’s easier to warn people about the danger that threaten their lives, and take urgent actions faster. In addition, todays people can easier launch a worldwide campaign to put pressure on governments to embrace more green politics, which are humans’ best hope in the long-term. Furthermore, todays, due to social networking, it’s easier for non-governmental organizations -NGO- to raise awareness, so attract more volunteers and potential donation, which will result in greater protection.
To draw the conclusion grounded on the above statements, I subscribe to the idea that nowadays people can better protect the environment, mainly because they are more knowledgeable and better equipped in both raising humans’ awareness and nature conservation. Nowadays not only can people implement quickly short-term strategies, but they also can more efficiently adopt the long-term, which undoubtedly result in greater environmental protection.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-23 | wxr031 | 52 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | Greenbluemind | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-04 | OlliverYang | 70 | view |
| 2020-04-26 | Reza3068 | 90 | view |
| 2018-05-26 | mehmoh | 76 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, may, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, i think, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 33.0 8.0752688172 409% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2882.0 1977.66487455 146% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86965376782 4.8611393121 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2381085912 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55600814664 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 894.6 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.1550459717 48.9658058833 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 192.133333333 100.406767564 191% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7333333333 20.6045352989 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 5.45110844103 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200758800727 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792775130701 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586667348729 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127230281834 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623331047275 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.6 11.7677419355 192% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 58.1214874552 38% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.1575268817 178% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.36 10.9000537634 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.01818996416 128% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 86.8835125448 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 30.0 10.002688172 300% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.