Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “It is better to read books on an electronic device than it is to read traditional books on paper.
Thanks to development of technology, we all now have all things in the electronic format such as games, magazines, books etc. While some people prefer to be updated and read books on mobile phones or tablets, others would rather keep reading traditional paper books. I personally would prefer to read printed books. What are the differences between electronic books and printed ones? I will explain my reasons in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, by reading on a tablet or cellphone, there would be so many distractions such as notifications of different applications like Instagram, Facebook or phone calls which will not allow the reader to concentrate. Besides, paper books are more accessible because everyone can carry them without needing any complements. For example, electronic devices need charger or access to internet which are not in access anywhere and at anytime. Drawing from my own experience, when I was a kid, I used to read science fictions books in my leisure time therefore I had to bring them wherever I go. Once my family and I were going to a rain forests trip I decided to read online version of my books because we had limitations in the weight of our carriage. but at our destination there were neither plugs to charge my phone nor internet. As a result, I could not read anything and I did not enjoy that trip. For this reason, I believe that traditional book are better than electronics.
On the other hand, it is not healthy for eyes to be in contact with e-devices for a period of time. According to recent studies, in the last decades, eye problems specifically low vision have been increased due to over using of tablets and laptops. also, scientists have warn that if people do not control their amount of using these devices, societies will be facing new generation with eye defects. For example, one of the researches in this subject has explained in details that working more than 2 hours a day can spoil vessels in the eye which are responsible for carrying blood to the cells. so, in the long run eye cells will be destroyed. one of the best ways to reduce working with electronic devices is to read printed books.
In the light of above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that not only reading traditional book is good but also it is better for health.
- TPO 44 Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are relate 76
- Agree or disagree In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- friend has decided to switch careers but isn t sure which to choose What advice would you give them Provide reasons and examples to support your response 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to read books on an electronic device than it is to read traditional books on paper 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 757, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...itations in the weight of our carriage. but at our destination there were neither ...
^^^
Line 7, column 790, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riage. but at our destination there were neither plugs to charge my phone nor int...
^^
Line 13, column 85, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s to be in contact with e-devices for a period of time. According to recent studies, in the la...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 250, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...e to over using of tablets and laptops. also, scientists have warn that if people do...
^^^^
Line 13, column 272, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'warned'.
Suggestion: warned
...lets and laptops. also, scientists have warn that if people do not control their amo...
^^^^
Line 13, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on with eye defects. For example, one of the researches in this subject has expla...
^^
Line 13, column 600, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...nsible for carrying blood to the cells. so, in the long run eye cells will be dest...
^^
Line 13, column 649, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...e long run eye cells will be destroyed. one of the best ways to reduce working with...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85964912281 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74331585371 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568922305764 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8817292921 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.95 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.95 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305714136295 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911686150517 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727481391823 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19473162689 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555472806419 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.