Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “It is better to read books on an electronic device than it is to read traditional books on paper.”
I strongly agree with the viewpoint that electronic version of books is much more rewarding than the orthodox methods of consuming text and accompanying photographs on paper.
Some might say that the conventional medium is easier on the eye and makes the experience of reading much more thorough and immersive. However, I believe that the new wave of e-books is a win-win for all stakeholders. I would justify my position through the following set of two reasons.
Firstly , electronic books and devices are environmental friendly. Almost, no trees are usurped for production of millions of thousands of e-books and e-book readers. Juxtapose this with the number of football fields required to stack up all the paper required for printing one of the many parts of Harry potter fiction series for circulation around the world. Had it not been for these virtual friends we would have lost million of trees to service the desire for knowledge of an ever-increasing global population.
Secondly , the devices that are powered to carry large virtual libraries are far more utilitarian . These devices are constructed to enhance our reading experience by a few notches at the least. This is made possible by a super tractable design, a glare free screen and a variety of other features that includes definition lookup for words as well as text highlight among many others. In contrast, paper books look archaic and cumbrous when evaluated against parameters of utility. Indeed, a world with these antiquated forms of print can best be recalled through conjuring up a scenario where a student is toting heavy textbooks while trying to make it in time for the lecture. Without a question, these e-books have revolutionised our reading experience by bringing more value to them and by dispensing with the heaviness inherent in the traditional ones.
All in all, the argument that e-books have proven to be more valuable than traditional one is a complicated one. With the naysayers citing the allure of physical copies to bolster their standpoint. Nevertheless, I strongly contend that this new form of consuming print is markedly superior to the one which it is going to replace in years to come.
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others. 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing games teaches us about life. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.“According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 52
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “It is better to read books on an electronic device than it is to read traditional books on paper.” 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...experience of reading much more thorough and immersive. However, I believe that t...
^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...llowing set of two reasons. Firstly , electronic books and devices are envir...
^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Firstly , electronic books and devices are environmental friendly. Almost, no ...
^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are environmental friendly. Almost, no trees are usurped for production of mill...
^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any parts of Harry potter fiction series for circulation around the world. Had it...
^^
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...hese virtual friends we would have lost million of trees to service the desire for kno...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llion of trees to service the desire for knowledge of an ever-increasing global p...
^^
Line 11, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...reasing global population. Secondly , the devices that are powered to carry l...
^^
Line 11, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rtual libraries are far more utilitarian . These devices are constructed to enhanc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12777777778 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84438696876 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6229106205 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.588235294 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1764705882 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228756362802 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736793359139 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609343842448 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126207533183 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405286604964 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.