Sometimes people are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The group will be helped more by a person who is willing to do what other group members want than by a person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do.
First and foremost, willing to do other members' desires bring about a close relationship among all of them and paves the way for a group to flourish. It goes without saying that human beings feel sympathy towards whoever listening and being agreed with them; ergo, this feeling causes better relationships and even friendships. Moreover, members of a group who are each other’s good friends can act more cooperatively and increase the effectiveness of a group’s function. To shed light on this, imagine a company's sales team is going to do a beneficial sale, and they are required to work with each other to attract the customers. A company in which the sales team members are friendlier, because members do not reject others' ideas, would understand each other while negotiating and covering each other's flaws. As a result, the members help the company indirectly by listening to other members of the team and building a good relationship.
Another reason coming to mind is that standing alone against a group's interests would be considered persistency and can break the group apart. To put it simply, when a single group member goes on as he wishes, other members would think of him as an obstinate person and will never want to consider his words. Therefore, as the person insists on his ideas, ; the groups could deviate from its path since there would be extreme disputes about the matter. Take for example a personal experience, once when my friends and I decided to go on a bush crafting adventure, I suddenly opined to go on another direction in that I felt the passage could be easier to pass. Afterward, as my friends refused my decision and I kept on insisting a rival between me and another one happened and made us stop the adventure and go went back for avoiding a bigger fights. Had I not insisted on my belief , our adventure as a group would have not faced a failure.
All the above-mentioned ideas prove the point that a person who is willing to do what other group members want will help the group. This is owing to the fact that a good listener makes the members friendlier with each other . Besides, a single person cannot counter a whole team's wishes without a problem .
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why 70
- Sometimes people are assigned to work in a group on a project Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The group will be helped more by a person who is willing to do what other group members want than by a person who often strongly insists th 70
- It is important to know about the happening of the world 3
- It is important to know about the happening of the world 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Company should pay for employees to get university degree 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder. To begin with, people tend to hide their...
^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Honesty
...friends which they had created for me. honesty with my friends cause to those problems...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, hence, if, moreover, so, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83651226158 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66647393176 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542234332425 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.116931745 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.411764706 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238664879003 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847393864378 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706841151018 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160958095825 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228166408968 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.