Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads
People have different views about whether the official council should invest more in the railroad. Personally, I completely agree that the government should put more resources into the extension of the railway system.
For a variety of reasons, it would be wrong to spend more money on roads. Firstly, although building a wider road can alleviate the problem of traffic congestion, it also encourages citizens to drive their own automobiles daily. According to the report from Hong Kong Environment Protection Department, emission from cars is a major source of air pollution. Secondly, the return of extending road is not ideal because traditional public transportation is not popular at the present. For example, personally I only took buses when I was a student since there was no subway. As a result, more resources are put into a construction project, but it might have a harmful impact on our community.
Above from practical concerns expressed, I also believe that it is worth to have a railway expansion. The government should have a greater concern that public budget should be spent on public service and meet the needs of the public, such as infrastructure and economic development. In the first place, Building a larger mass transport railway can promote economic growth. MTR in Hong Kong is the most rapid railway in the world, which carries over 5 million passengers per day. Another reason is that tourists around the world can visit different attractions and spots and this probably can stimulate the tourism industry.
In conclusion, I fully agree that more public expenditure should be spent on the development of the subway.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Thanh Phong B2407053 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Tấn Quý | 30 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Thanh Phong B2407053 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Ngô Quốc Thắng | 56 | view |
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 73
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014
- the chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 78
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1828358209 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85791423211 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5089039389 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.2142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192840315873 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572119775085 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518268038064 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106003508853 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385396066557 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.