The table below gives data on tourists visiting in Vietnam from 8 different countries.
The table under illustrates the number of visiting tourists in Vietnam from the nations of China, Cambodia, United States, United Kingdom, Japan, Korea, Russia, and Australia with the average vacation stay and expenses in US dollars currency.
Overall, Chinese visitors have the most number followed by the Koreans. On the other hand, the least number of tourists were from Cambodia. Then, based on the average amount of stay in Vietnam, Russians ranked at the top while Cambodia at the bottom. Subsequently, according to the extent of money expenditure, in American dollars, Australians spent the highest and the people from Cambodia consumed the lowest.
The range of people visiting in Vietnam starts from above 200,000 and reaches to a maximum of just below 1.5 Million with China having the peak rank with 1,453,798, followed by Korea at 987,635, Japan at 571,000, United States of America at 404,875, UK at 214,937, Russia at 275,082, Australia at 243,897, and Cambodia having the minimal number of visitors at 187,986.
For the mean of length of visit, all ranged from a little bit above 3 to just below 18 with Russia on the first place and Cambodia in the end. Meanwhile, for the average expenditure, all tourists spent between more than a hundred to less than 1900 $< American currency, with the Australians spending the most and Cambodians spending the least.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-10-10 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-09 | wholemilk | 78 | view |
- The table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 11
- The table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 11
- The table below gives data on tourists visiting in Vietnam from 8 different countries 56
- The table shows the number of nuclear weapons owned by different nations in different years 39
- The table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...n of length of visit, all ranged from a little bit above 3 to just below 18 with Russia on...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: CURRENCY[2]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$1900'.
Suggestion: $1900
...etween more than a hundred to less than 1900 $ ^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12888888889 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54287381138 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551111111111 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.6629595945 43.030603864 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.25 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164515320254 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772339783553 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565625861423 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111235044482 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407868667405 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.