It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree of disagree?
It is argued that it is crucial to invest government money in encouraging a healthy lifestyle instead of allocating money to the treatment of people who are already suffering from illness. In my opinion, I almost agree with this view.
Firstly, I advocate that governments should pour budget on activities and campaigns that promote how to lead a healthy lifestyle. This is because some diseases nowadays regarding people's unhealthy habits. For example, children who eat fast-food on a daily basis commonly can suffer from a range of health issues, such as weight problems and obesity. Therefore, authorities should mobilize their residents to follow a healthy lifestyle by saying no to fast food, from that, they can avoid ailments resulting from eating such as obesity and many cardiovascular diseases. In addition, a healthy lifestyle based on regular exercise should be advocated, this is not only improving the immune system but also preventing various inflammations and mental health problems, such as depression.
Secondly, current medical expenses are extremely expensive, so effective prevention is, in the long run, less costly than cure for both patients and the whole society. To be more specific, effective illness preclusion will reduce the number of people who visit hospitals and this will decrease the cost burden which used to support public healthcare systems.
In conclusion, for the aforementioned reasons, I believe that the spending of governmental money should be centred on disease prevention by raising public awareness of regular exercise and maintaining healthy eating habits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-02 | nguyen.ttn1998 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 84
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The tables below show the results of a survey of urban residents opinions related to various aspects of life in 1980 and 2010 89
- The tables give information on the temperatures and the hours of daylight in two particular cites in the same week in May 2007 78
- Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a positive development while others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50806451613 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88879703043 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657258064516 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1494625942 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.6 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8 7.06120827912 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22994363318 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771398454795 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585352420756 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136268654061 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423117810156 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50806451613 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88879703043 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657258064516 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1494625942 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.6 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8 7.06120827912 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22994363318 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771398454795 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585352420756 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136268654061 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423117810156 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.