The line graph shows the rates of smoking in Someland for men and women between 1960 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.
The report aims to provide information about the number of smokers, represented by genders, in Someland over the 40-year period from 1960 to 2000.
Overall, it is clear that the rate of smoking in male population experienced a downward, while
that of female illustrated an upward trend during the given period.
To begin with, the percentage of smoking men stood at approximately 60 per cent in 1960, experiencing a significant decrease as of that year. By the end of 2000, the number of male smokers dropped to approximately 250 per 1000 people.
Women, on the other hand, showed an increase in the number of smokers. In 1960, the figure of smoking female in Someland stood at about a hundred per thousand, only six times smaller than that of men. It began to rise until the year 1975 at a rate of 315 per 1000 people. Then, it slightly slipped back to about 200 people per 1000 by 2000, almost equal to the number of men smokers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-31 | NeutronnzZ | 67 | view |
- The charts provide information about people s travel in one country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- What could be done to encourage people to buy local products An increasing number of people are buying what they need online What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shopping online 89
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012 73
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...population experienced a downward, while that of female illustrated an upward tre...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68072289157 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59280495566 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572289156627 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.218735301 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.125 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175846292977 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774941888813 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381731831466 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089356239777 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527031669596 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.