Films were produced by big companies in the past, but today people are able to make a film. Do you think this trend is positive or negative?
Filmmaking has been expanded from being processed solely by professional studios to personal producers since more people are gaining access to cinematic techniques at an affordable price. In my opinion, this is a positive trend.
First of all, this trend can boost innovations to take place. Big companies are no longer the only player competing in the market. Although brand awareness is still one of the decisive factors in the success of the film industry and this can encourage the giants to come up with more fresh ideas and seek for more creations. For example, an independent film project entitled “Saigon Sunny Days”, directed by a Vietnamese director, found great successes while competing with other 18 entries by famed directors all over the world.
Second of all, the less complex filmmaking process is also beneficial to people who pick up filming merely as a hobby or a means to express themselves. Shooting films itself is a fascinating and utterly harmless activity, it allows people to keep their wonderful moments around them. In addition, multiple cameras make shooting easier as shooting digitally can shoot multiple takes, and to get multiple angles more economically. In other words, the combination of low-cost equipment and the enthusiasm of amateur filmmakers enhances an individual’s spiritual life and might lead to the discovery of one’s hidden talent.
In conclusion, being able to make a film on our own is no short of its merits. This trend also plays a vital role in shaping public opinions and raising awareness due to its direct impact on a culture basis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-19 | fanncia99 | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | perry1812 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | Le Bich Diep | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- 2020 has witnessed the outbreak of rare and new disease has been preying on the minds of thousands of people in the world Some people complain that this illness has taken the lives of many people slow down development in many different fields others claim 56
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 50
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents 84
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
..., multiple cameras make shooting easier as shooting digitally can shoot multiple t...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e discovery of one’s hidden talent. In conclusion, being able to make a film o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1724137931 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77217826423 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8307835239 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217266071611 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790880772192 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506730233029 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120608513574 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192792884448 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.