Summarize the information in reading and the lecture.
The reading and the lecture are both about behavior and lifestyle of Agnostids as a group of marine animals that became extinct. The author of the reading feels that there are a few theories that can explain their food type and their way of life. The lecturer, however, challenges the claims made by the author. She believes that those theories are faulty.
First of all, the author suggests that agnostids were free swimmer predators that hunted smallers animals. In addition, the reading states that there are other type of primitive arthropods that are very strong swimmers and because these animals are realted, it is possible that agnostids were a strong swimmer too. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this specific argument. She asserts that primitive arthropods have big and strong eyes and vision is very essential or being a predator while the agnostids have poor and tiny eyes and sometimes they are completely blind. So if they werea predator, they should have other sensors for locating the prey while there is no evidence of these sensors.
Furthermore, the writer says that agnostids live on the sea floor. Also, the reading says that other type of primitive arthropods lived in this way, therefore it is possible that agnotids live in this way. Nonetheless, the lecturer rebuts this theory. She posits that this theory cannot be true because animals that live on the sea floor cannot move very fast or go far distances and tend to live locally and move very slow. She brings up the information that however agnostids are found in a specific geological area, but most of agnostids aslo are found in the different area and this discovery has proven that these animals were able to move very fast and far distnces.
Finally, the author claims that agnostids were parasites that live and feed on the bigger animals. In the reading it is stated that modern-day arthropods are parasire, so it seems that agnotids were parasites too. Whereas the lecturer points out that this theory is wrong beause parasites have small population. Great population of parasites can kill the host. She argues that the population of agnotids are very high and the huge number of their fossils have been found.
- Your friend wants to lose weight what advice would you give to you friend and why 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more interested in politics now than they were in the past 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily 70
- Summarize the information in reading and the lecture 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If you do not make sure other people especially influential people or your employers know about your strengths and accomplishments you will never get successful in life 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... their food type and their way of life. The lecturer, however, challenges the claim...
^^^
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...seems that agnotids were parasites too. Whereas the lecturer points out that this theor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, whereas, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 10.4613686534 239% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 22.412803532 219% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 369.0 270.72406181 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9945799458 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42128447684 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476964769648 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 419.366225166 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1389747638 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4210526316 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124994510347 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426062200023 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524849588752 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831155027498 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315886871348 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.