The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
There are different ways of approaching a target and every way has its advantages and disadvantages. It is quite patent that there are some ways that are more reliable than others and results corroborating them can be found in the historical dataset pertaining to methods and their respective results. Two such methods are competition and cooperation. Although for a society to prepare its people for leadership in government or other fields, either can be applied, I disagree with cooperation being the way forward and support competition for three reasons.
To begin, it is important to highlight the naturally competitive nature of human beings. It is very difficult for every person to shy away from the congenital sense of competiting to better themselves. Thus, same is the case in young people preparing for leadership in government or other fields. To elaborate, we should consider the current parliamentarian structure of different countries that have a ruling party and an opposition party. Every party is competing to stay in power and the form of improvement applied is constructive criticism. In doing so, the opposition party identifies the flaws in the policies of the ruling party and also highlight its competence as a capable party to run the country. Had the parties been collaborative from the very onset, such corrective measures would not been put forth as that would have been treated as opposing the central policy and thus it is evident that competition has an edge over cooperation.
Further, competition is necessary to ensure there is room for other adroit participants to take part and contribute to the ongoing scheme of things. Competition is something that drives out the best in a person and thus help in the growth of the overall cause. To illustrate this, we can consider sports as a field that is highly competitive. Lawn Tennis is a very good sport that depicts how individuals perform differently when individually pressured as compared to team play. Rafael Nadal is a prime example of great individual performance who entered the scene when Roger Federer had established himself as an authority. But Nadal was able to up his game and sustain at the highest level for a very long time, owing to the competitive nature of the sport. Also, when it comes to team play. these players are not the greatest and thus we can see how competition is beneficial in the long run. Competition also helps bring out the best in the opposition, which is another benefit of competition.
Finally, it is also important to note that competition naturally breeds cooperation in a way that cooperation is ancillary to competition and smart people implement both in a way that yields better results. To throw some light on this, we can take the example of people working together as teams to accomplish a project in a software company. The teams have individuals competiting among themselves but it is the overall goal of achieving the desired end goal that is yields the best results. Hence people are competitive enough to understand that showing cooperation would help them leverage the strengths of the other person to their advantage and help achieve the bigger goal.
Having mentioned the above reasons, it is important to consider the other side of the argument where competition is not always the best and if taken beyond limits, competition can prove inimical. Consider individuals and countries vying for a desired commodity that can be lead them to take unscrupulous and treacherous paths that are condemnible and despicable. Thus it is important to keep the desire of achieving the end goal in check and since there are so many systems and organizations that keep an eye on such developments, there are more benefits of competition that disadvantages.
In conclusion, we can say that it is better to teach young individuals to compete than to collaborate most of the time to achieve success in leadership positions of countries, industries or other fields of work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | AkellaSrinivas | 66 | view |
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 73
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 57
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 73
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 58
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 795, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...port. Also, when it comes to team play. these players are not the greatest and thus w...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 494, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...d goal that is yields the best results. Hence people are competitive enough to unders...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 364, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...hs that are condemnible and despicable. Thus it is important to keep the desire of a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, so, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 40.0 19.5258426966 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.3162921348 212% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3347.0 2235.4752809 150% => OK
No of words: 661.0 442.535393258 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06354009077 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.07049507093 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96812817029 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 308.0 215.323595506 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465960665658 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1062.0 704.065955056 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2701967606 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.535714286 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6071428571 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.92857142857 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 10.2758426966 214% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364712763786 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874682992459 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1007107182 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181481350095 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870407411244 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.