The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.
The given bar chart details an investment survey report with regard to five essential goods (cars, computers, books, perfume, and cameras) in the UK, and France for the year 2010. The amount of expenditure is measured in pounds sterling.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that although both the countries spent a good amount on the consumer goods, the proportion invested by the UK was the maximum except on perfumes, where each country was least interested.
According to the given illustration, the UK led France in the purchase of cars, and books by investing 50,000 and 100,000 pounds sterling more as opposed to 400,000 and 300,000 pounds invested by France. In addition, the purchase of cameras went higher by nearly two-fold in the UK in comparison to France, who spent only 150,000 pounds sterling.
However, a contrasting trend was seen in the context of computers, where France surpassed the UK by 300,000 pounds sterling. Furthermore, despite the least contribution to perfumes by both the countries, France exceeded the UK by spending an extra 600,000 pounds sterling against 140,000 spent by the UK.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The table shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 84
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 77
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 11
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
...ey report with regard to five essential goods cars, computers, books, perfume, and ca...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...50,000 and 100,000 pounds sterling more as opposed to 400,000 and 300,000 pounds i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, look, so, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22702702703 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74339102251 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578378378378 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.423688758 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.142857143 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106753192241 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545887810568 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551041274391 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772689972021 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678088974773 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
...ey report with regard to five essential goods cars, computers, books, perfume, and ca...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...50,000 and 100,000 pounds sterling more as opposed to 400,000 and 300,000 pounds i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, look, so, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22702702703 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74339102251 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578378378378 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.423688758 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.142857143 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106753192241 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545887810568 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551041274391 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772689972021 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678088974773 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.