The chart below shows the changes that took place in three diffrent areas of crime in Panama city from 2010 to 2019.
The line graph indicates the information about the number of three different kind of crimes : burglary; theft and robbery in Panama City, in the years 2010 to 2019.
Overall, the most striking fact emerged from the line chart is that, the incidents of robbery was stabled; the crime of car hefting was fluctuated and the housebreaking cases was fall down around the all years.
According to the line graph, in 2010, there were 3500 cases of burglary, below 3000 crimes of car theft and more than 500 incidents of robbery. Car thefting cases were decreased to 2000 and 500 more incidents of housebreaking (2500) in 2013, however, from 2013 to 2016 the number of car stolen crimes were stabled (2000); the burglary cases were declined to 1,000 crimes in 2015, while, in 2016, it was increased by 500 (1500) and stabled from 2016 to 2019. The incidents of car theft were slightly inclined to 2800 cases in the years 2016 to 2019.
Lastly, from 2010 to 2019 the crimes of robbery were stabled (500) for all the years.
- The Pie Charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010 67
- full time university student spend a lot of time studying however they sholud perform other activities too To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- People in this 21st century enjoying better life quality compared people who lived in the previous centuries Advantage aand disadvantage 61
- The bar chart below gives information about scoence qualifications held by people in two countries
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kind' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kinds'.
Suggestion: kinds
...ion about the number of three different kind of crimes : burglary; theft and robbery...
^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...incidents of robbery. Car thefting cases were decreased to 2000 and 500 more inci...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69662921348 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30234030658 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488764044944 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.6999927568 43.030603864 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.333333333 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180768519488 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110401962056 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520418678992 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13448679196 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460799432702 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.