Many criminals commit crimes after they were set free. Research indicates that the people who were convicted criminals would often commit crimes when they are set free. Why is this the case? What can be done to solve this issue?
It is true that the rate of recidivism among the ex-prisoners after being release is considerably high. This can be attributed to a number of reasons, but certain approaches could be taken to tackle the problem.
There are different reasons for which the convicted perpetrators often break the law when they leave penal institution, one of which is unemployment. In fact, being unable to find a job, some people decide to get involved in unlawful acts to make a living. However, with a criminal record, these violators may find it much harder to apply for a vacancy whether they are well reformed or not. Without a stable job and regular income, the former convicted delinquents would participate in the crime cycle again. Another justification is the lack of proper education before people engage in criminal activities or during the time they are incarcerated. There is no denying that those who commit crimes often have mental problems, and hardly could they realize the repercussions of their actions to the communities.
Nonetheless, authorities could adopt several actions in order to deal with the above-mentioned issue. One possible step might involve providing the culprits with proper vocation training so that they will acquire necessary skills to apply themselves in the labor force. This would in turn increase their employability after they leave the penitentiary, thus mitigating the possibility of reoffending. Education would also be a viable solution to rehabilitate the inmates. For the would-be offenders, it is essential to incorporate moral lessons into school curriculum or educational television programs to raise their awareness of potential fallouts of deliberate infraction. An alternative would be the practical campaign such as community service for criminals to partake in, which would subsequently make them become productive members of the society.
In sum, there can be no doubt that people commit and re-commit offences for different contributing factors. Still, governments could take various measures to grapple with this situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-10 | Lee Hwa | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | mohamadi654094 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | mohamadi654094 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | mohamadi654094 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | mohamadi654094 | 67 | view |
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work What could be the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Nowadays there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Water resources around the world are falling deficient Analyze the possible reasons and provide your suggestions 89
- It is impossible to help all people around the world in need so governments should focus on people from their own country To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- Young people are now spending more and more time and money following fashion trends What is your opinion Is this a positive or negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, thus, well, in fact, no doubt, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46105919003 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02684809279 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629283489097 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3922219562 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5625 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265129592962 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767617518979 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430778777609 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14940625719 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452108058448 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.