Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible.
As the main problem of living on the surface of Venus is its high pressure, the solution could be staying in a station up into the atmosphere of Venus. As anyone would know, the pressure above the surface of a particular planet is much less. According to calculations, being 50 km above Venus's surface is perfect for the human being because the pressure would be the same as earth's at this height.
The second problem, which is lack of water and oxygen in the atmosphere of Venus, is solvable due to the existence of carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid n the planet's atmosphere. These chemical contributions contain oxygen and the essential molecules of water, which are hydrogen and oxygen, so by some chemical transformation, the human could bring its needed oxygen and water out of the mixture of Venus's atmosphere.
The last problem could be solved by living far from Venus's surface too. In the 50 km distance from the surface, the cloud is not thick as much, and the sunlight could get through the atmosphere further, and by solar cells, the human could save and restore the required light and energy to live and produce electricity for the station respectively.
In conclusion, living on Venus does not seem impossible anymore, and at some levels may even be possible and worth putting more effort into.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
2023-06-25 | YasamanEsml | 65 | view |
2023-02-11 | reza_fattahi | 83 | view |
2023-02-11 | reza_fattahi | 76 | view |
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon On the other hand conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 76
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
... carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid n the planets atmosphere. These chemical contribution...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, second, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 22.412803532 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83111111111 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61839268386 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.3797328357 49.2860985944 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.875 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169013032643 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760394148271 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546344573455 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995717350576 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594796395346 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.