The Pie Charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
The Pie Charts indicate the information about the units of electricity output from different sources in two countries : New Zealand; Germany in the years between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, the most striking fact emerged from the pie charts is that, the highest number of units for generated from coal in New Zealand and by nuclear in Germany, however, the lowest from hydro and natural gas.
According to the Pie Charts, in 1980, there were 127 total units, 56 units were produced by coal, which was tripled (approximately 150) in 2010 in New Zealand. Natural gas and hydro generated same units (30) in 1980, 11 units were output from Petroleum, which was declined to 2 units and similar units produced from natural gas in 2010, 46 units were generated by hydro, total 200 units were outcome from all origins.
In addition, in Germany, in 1980, 107 units and 214 units in 2010 generated by five elements. Coal produce 28 units in both of the years also same units from Natural Gas in 1980, which was decreased to 2 units in 2010, and similar units from hydro. Nuclear generated 20 units and 150 units in 1980 and 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-19 | mantue0909 | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-19 | mantue0909 | 56 | view |
| 2020-11-13 | Jango Jo | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-11 | faisal vhora | 89 | view |
| 2020-07-11 | MAHIR VHORA | 67 | view |
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of Global Warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to takel the issue 78
- what are theadvantages aand disadva antages of mobile 73
- The bar chart below gives information about scoence qualifications held by people in two countries
- cutting down tree is real environment threat yes this is still happening at a great rate around the world why do you think forests are being destroyed are there benefits from the destruction of forest 84
- The bar chart below gives information about scoence qualifications held by people in two countries
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7193877551 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29950919414 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469387755102 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.7341237956 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.142857143 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236912091566 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167106400866 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112539647045 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205737867558 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124273378402 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.