fewer cars in the future
Since the car was invented and developed, their number have increased vertically in most countries. Some people believe that tendency will continue because cars are part of fancy style lives and a high-status images. However, I totally disagree because I think cars will decrease in the following years for two main reasons; first, people are more concern for the environment, and second, the cost of life has increased.
Environmental care is one of the most important issue that people and institution take in attention in the last years. Reducing of forest trees, increasing of greenhouse gas, and growing up of pollution are some of the biggest problems these days. Vehicles are part of on one of these group, and people will have definitely less cars in order to reduce the planet contamination in the future. Some countries, for example, are improving their system transportation encouraging people to use them for commuting. One demonstration of these new system is in Europe. More specifically in Spain has changed their old buses for new electrics buses that are not only less contaminant, but also are faster.
Cost of life has increased around the world since items have grown up as well. Furthermore, people have had to work more hours or find a second job, but sometimes it is not enough for covering the month family budget. Expenses such as rent, services, and car cares are so expensive that families will have to reduce some items or services for reducing the amount of money at the end of the month. One of those expensive items are cars. Reducing the number of cars for each family, not only we can reduce environment pollution, but also make more efficient budgets.
In conclusion, one of our standard life is having the last beautiful and fancy car. Nevertheless, I believe this kind of standard life will change for a better standards, because people want to take care of the environment, and family budget are too much expensive to continue with this style of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- Playing computer games is a waste of time Children not be allowed play them 71
- fewer cars in the future 70
- traveling alone or with a companion 73
- Some people said that the internet provide people with a lot of valuable information Others things access to so much information create problems which view you agree with 73
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... group, and people will have definitely less cars in order to reduce the planet cont...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95238095238 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70103674351 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526785714286 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3377161997 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0896234118231 0.236089414692 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352577352396 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410350615 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649544822371 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353296996149 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.