The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000, 2005, and 2010.
The given bar chart details the proportional change in the number of aspirants who pursued higher education over three different years 2000, 2005, and 2010.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the majority of young students who opted for higher education rose significantly in countries A and D. Although country C also recorded an uptick during the earlier year, the percentage leveled off thereafter. Also, followed by a few fluctuations, country B remained at the lowest position in this context.
According to the given illustration, country D led the whole distribution, where almost 60% of youngsters went for higher studies in 2000, the proportion jumped by nearly 4% in the next 5 years and thereafter it witnessed a dramatic surge of nearly 16% by the end of the period. Followed next by country A, who observed a significant increasing pattern starting from 35% in 2000, 45% in 2005, and finally 58% in 2010.
On the contrary, although country C was ahead of country A by almost 15% in 2000, the proportion got stagnant at approximately 52% during the last decade. On the other hand, with a 3% drop down in country B nearly 37% of students pursued further studies in 2005. Despite a few ups and downs, country B maintained 40% of students in 2010, but still, country B ranked the lowest with regard to higher educated students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the population figures for different types of turtles in India from 1980 to 2012 78
- The diagram below shows how the instant noodles are manufactured 63
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows tourism statistics among Venezuelan students from 2011 to 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- Many people say that the only way to guarantee a good job is to complete a course in university education Others claim that it is better to start work after school and gain experience in the world of work How far do you agree or disagree with the above vi
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, look, so, still, on the contrary, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96551724138 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85201547526 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2245118794 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232869423209 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970734206593 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913870520682 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161813925628 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958090702955 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.