Some people believe that to be a successful sportsperson, one needs to have a natural ability. Others think that hard work and practice are more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Time is altering and so is the avid aspiration of being a universally renowned sports player for people from all walks of life, the world over. Either inborn gifts or continuing perspiration can play an indispensable role to be a globally triumphant athlete, has sparked a heated debate. Although it is advocated by some that the essential part of innate abilities should not constitute on par with arduous efforts to be a strikingly successful player, this is stringently refuted by this essay that this may not be the case. Throughout the following paragraphs, the paramount significance of hard perseverance in comparison with a congenital facility, as a feasible must to succeed, will be meticulously scrutinized to uphold this adequately rational standpoint.
It is supported by some that an intrinsic flair can act as a precursor to becoming a first-rate sports person inasmuch as it is believed by them that success is inextricably interwoven with natural talents, on the one side. Take Mr. Ronaldo, a highly sophisticated soccer player in the national team of Portugal, as an illustration. Having touched upon his striking accomplishments in soccer at a really early age, never could he, without a shadow of a doubt, be able to do so in the event he was not a genius football prodigy. It is, thus, clearly exemplified by shedding light on this glaringly apparent instance that natural skills can catalyze as the only influential factor to make an athlete conspicuously famous. However, this opinion is sternly considered superficial by this essay as assiduousness is remarkably neglected in this issue.
On the other hand, rarely is it deniable that ordinary people cannot achieve their long-term goals to be a superstar at sports just owing to their lack of inborn pertaining facility. It has been several shown throughout the Olympics’ history that, Mr. Huphi, an average runner, without any natural ability, could surplus their opponents in arduous tournaments, just thanks to his admirable perseverance and non-stop practice, for example. By this, it is crystal clear that outstandingly hard practice as well as unexceptional patience can be made up for a usual athlete’s lack of natural flair at his favorite sports field. It is, hence, easily noticeable that all people, whether naturally talented or not, can adequately fortify their sophistication to become such number one celebrities at sports that the role of natural talents can be pale.
To recapitulate, after careful situational analysis of the importance of innate potentials or determined perseverance to be a superb sports player, it is demonstrated that the latter factor deems to be more pivotal. This is owing to a myriad of triumphant average people at sports without any natural ability. Based on the aforementioned compelling grounds, it is, therefore, hoped these points will be taken into account by sports enthusiasts in the foreseeable future throughout the world
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured
- Older people are waiting to be retired but when they get retired they feel unhappy Why this is the case What can be done to solve this problem 84
- Some people believe that to be a successful sportsperson one needs to have a natural ability Others think that hard work and practice are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and employees to the countryside To what extent to you agree or disagree 73
- Older people are waiting to be retired but when they get retired they feel unhappy Why this is the case What can be done to solve this problem 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Time is altering and so is the avid aspi...
^^^
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...iration of being a universally renowned sports player for people from all walks of lif...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 671, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...th a congenital facility, as a feasible must to succeed, will be meticulously scrutiniz...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d this adequately rational standpoint. It is supported by some that an intrinsi...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is remarkably neglected in this issue. On the other hand, rarely is it deniable...
^^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is rarely
...d in this issue. On the other hand, rarely is it deniable that ordinary people cannot...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e role of natural talents can be pale. To recapitulate, after careful situation...
^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... determined perseverance to be a superb sports player, it is demonstrated that the lat...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2485.0 1615.20841683 154% => OK
No of words: 472.0 315.596192385 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26483050847 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13367368524 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 176.041082164 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563559322034 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 791.1 506.74238477 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3457610959 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.3125 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171256923368 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537111943731 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334366112108 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102552519552 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00637764861404 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 78.4519038076 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.