The Graph shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Given is the line graph comparing four nations, namely the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal, in terms of the average amount of carbon dioxide that each person emitted over the 1967-2007 period.
Throughout the period, a British person released by far the largest amount of carbon dioxide of all time. While the UK and Sweden saw a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions, the figures for Italy and Portugal followed the opposite pattern.
In 1979, a UK resident was responsible for a tremendous quantity of carbon dioxide, particularly about 11 metric tonnes. This amount was followed by Sweden with 9 metric tons per person. In the following years, a decline in gas emission was seen for both nations, but a Swedish person suddenly released far less carbon dioxide than a British one after a peak at above 10 metric tons. Despite a steady drop in the gas amount, the British still discharged the highest carbon dioxide quantity, ending at about 9 metric tons per person, over twofold the figure for Sweden.
By contrast, the average carbon dioxide amount from Italy and Portugal was considerably lower than the UK and Sweden in 1967, at approximately 4 and 1 metric tons respectively. However, the gas amount per person in Italy increased so dramatically that its figure exceeded Sweden from 1987, and ending with a twofold amount compared to the initial year. Similarly, the emissions from each Portuguese person rocketed to the same amount as Sweden in the end.
- People think that countries should produce foods their population eats and import less food as much as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The maps below show the changes in a town in Europe after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam Describe the noticeable changes in the maps 81
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton 78
- School should focus more on teaching students how to be successful in the workforce and less on helping them achieve academic success To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses Why Who benefits more from this the community or these young people 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, similarly, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1235.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02032520325 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59369025956 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524390243902 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7737646396 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367054676711 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15809001541 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824557366814 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248309841976 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654203589226 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.