The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1900 to 2012
The line graph illustrates the proportion of Australian exports to four countries from 1900 to 2012.
Overall, all Japan, the US, and India experienced declines in products imported from Australia in the given period. By contrast, in China a significant increase in exported was registered over the survey time.
In 1990, Japan was the leading export market of Australia, receiving over 25% of all exported goods while the percentage of China was under 5%. However, in the next 12 years, China saw a huge increase of commodities imported from Australia, and reached the peak of nearly 30% in 2012 whereas Japan witnessed a sharp decrease then bottomed at roughly 18% at the end of survey.
Meanwhile, Australia exported just over 10% of its good to the US in 1990, which was around ten times higher than the exported to India. Over the following twelve-year, the figure for the US fluctuated, and dropped to 15% in 2012. On the other hand, India saw a slight upward trend then hit the highest point of about 18% before going down to nearly 15% in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-30 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-30 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-30 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 78
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Many people say that we have developed into a throw away society because we are filling up our environment with so many plastic bags and rubbish that we cannot fully dispose of To want degree do you agree with this opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 1615.20841683 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 182.0 315.596192385 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59152008122 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 176.041082164 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598901098901 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 506.74238477 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2337246759 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243011621458 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11790024582 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147751613195 0.0667982634062 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196097517571 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178773291967 0.056905535591 314% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 78.4519038076 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.