In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development?
Today almost every aspect of our life can be done online without the need for direct contact between people because of the proliferation of the Internet and technological devices. While some people argue that this development is positive, others believe otherwise.
On the one hand, the ability to shop, work, and communicate virtually is beneficial in terms of saving time and money. Firstly, e-commerce platforms allow shoppers to purchase all their daily necessities while sitting comfortably at home, without enduring traffic congestion while heading to a supermarket. Secondly, video conferencing save entrepreneurs hours of fatigue on costly long-haul flights to meet their partners and conduct business. Additionally, friends or colleagues can exchange information, strengthen their bonds in a blink of an eye thanks to free instant messaging applications.
On the other hand, a world lacking face-to-face contact can be disadvantageous in several ways. One possible demerit is that online shopping can be an ideal place for dishonest businesses, selling low-quality but expensive products, as there is no way to verify their trustworthiness without direct examination. Regarding remote working, it is often challenging to maintain a high level of concentration given the lack of close supervision from managers. Finally, online conversations between friends are usually deemed superficial, as current technology still struggles to convey genuine emotions compared to direct communication.
In conclusion, the fact that most of the essential aspects of our daily life can be done indirectly with the help of the latest technologies can be both positive and negative.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | minhphambinh1234 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | cinderel | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-12 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduates degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting 84
- Advertising is all around us it is an unavoidable part of everyone s life Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 78
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduates degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.732 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23359614052 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5756742602 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.272727273 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184744907 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644624772485 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701969309631 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986649647383 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448325747196 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.