Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may have a negative impact on others.
To what extent is this style of management effective?
Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
In recent decades, there has been a growing trend that monetary incentives would generally earned as a reward by employees for their exceptional contribution to the corporation’s development. Although it could be a beneficial phenomenon in some extents, a number of other worker-encouraging methods would outweigh those.
On the one hand, there are several benefits of paying bonuses to the employees. First, in order to generate workers’ motivation, awarding them a bonus would definitely be an efficient method. Therefore, their productivity would experience a significant increase, which could act as an incentive for substantial boosts in the company’s profit. Second, by giving extra monetary incentives to the employees, it could rapidly modify their unacceptable behaviors such as unpunctuality and bad dressing. According to a recent survey in BigC supermarket, since bonuses are awarded to punctual staffs, about 90% of those in total have changed their daily routine to get to work on time.
Nevertheless, there are also a variety of methods in order to motivate workers. First, by punishing badly-behaved workers, the pressure of others fields on the corporation’s budget would be reduced as it might be a more economical method than awarding bonuses. As a result, not only the company profits are significantly improved, but also the awareness of the staffs in that corporation would be raised. Second, instead of giving monetary incentives to the employees, managers could recommend them for promotion whenever they greatly contribute to the company’s success. As an exemplar is that almost 100% of BIDV’s staffs reported to be fully satisfied as well as motivated when they are promoted in a recent survey carried out by Vinh university’s students.
In conclusion, in spite of several advantages brought about by giving bonuses to employees, there are a number of other methods that could more efficiently and economically motivate the workers, namely promotion and punishment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-25 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | quytnee | 74 | view |
| 2022-02-25 | Fedya | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | sheep | 80 | view |
- Today many people do not realise how important the natural world is Why is this How can people learn more about the importance of the natural world 84
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management effectiv 73
- In most successful organisations some people believe that communication between managers and workers is important while other people said that other factors are more significant What is your opinion 84
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills What are the causes and suggest some possible solutions 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'earn'
Suggestion: earn
...hat monetary incentives would generally earned as a reward by employees for their exce...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52922077922 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24587488118 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558441558442 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6713046049 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187130589946 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671357765556 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591610899094 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112813702684 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471411284184 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.