Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that they do.
How far do you agree?
What criteria should be used to decide how much people are paid?
Salary has always been a reliable measure for the individual's success. According to the opinions of some people, there are a number of socially important jobs, such as teachers, doctors and nurses, are underpaid, in contrast to movie stars and high-level managers. Although the value of the first type of workers in undisputable, I claim that earnings of professionals ought to be decided on a free market.
Some professions, namely doctors and teachers, are crucial to any society, since they provide education and healthcare, which are presented among the most basic components of the personal wealth. Therefore, the reward should be proportional to their impact on people lives that are influenced by such workers. This means that their employers, which are usually authorities, must pay at least as much as the average income of a particular area. According to the Guardian report, earnings of teachers in Moscow is only 55 per cent of the mean value for this city, making this profession less attractive. Thus, society ought to ensure a fair reward for people's contribution to the society.
On the other hand, other industries, such as entertainment, is similarly vital for most individuals. Moreover, about 70 per cent of citizens of California claimed that they would rather spend a spear 100 dollars on movie theaters rather than on education. Hence, the financial support of film actors is a conscious decision of the majority, which is a common approach in the capitalistic world. In other words, people decide on what to spend money on, thus, on fair salaries of all workers.
In conclusion, undoubtedly, some professions have a high impact on our lives, but the freedom of economic behaviour that is one of the key components of any wealthy society should be the main criterion in finance distribution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-02 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-02 | vdrobny | 84 | view |
| 2018-02-27 | ravigujar123 | 89 | view |
| 2016-08-25 | ravibharaths | 85 | view |
| 2015-06-25 | roxanaluca | 58 | view |
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The bar chart gives information about the number of car journeys into the city centre made by residents and non residents Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below give information about world population living in various areas in 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- Television radio and newspapers influence our society opinions and views Do you agree or disagree 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... always been a reliable measure for the individuals success. According to the opinions of s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, thus, at least, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14141414141 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92381933751 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8287999145 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.461538462 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3846153846 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145853813207 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477707313365 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390296198931 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776150297017 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161940424201 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.