In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions
According to Malcom Gladwell, it takes a practitioner 10,000 hours to become well versed in a field. These thousands of hours can well equip anyone with the tools to potentially provide important contributions to their field. While it may be true that beginners in the same field may have innovative new ideas, ultimately the pathway of progress will be paved by the experts.
If an individual aspires to make great strides in their field, there is no way to circumvent the hours of studying and practicing which builds experience. Without this investment, one will always fall behind the experts who have devoted their lives to making contributions in the same field. For example, Thomas Edison tried over 1,000 different light bulbs before he struck success. A beginner, with no knowledge at all of what has worked so far and what hasn’t surely would not have been able to show up while Edison was on his 500th light bulb and produced a viable product. Even with the proper training, only incredible genius can avoid the travail of trial and error.
In addition, some fields are so complex that failure to produce results could simply be due to unrefined technique. For example, in biopharmaceuticals, the smallest miscalculation or slip of the hand can lead to sample contamination and the failure of an entire experiment which may have been a success in the steadier hands of an expert. No matter how extraordinary the young researcher might be, if they haven’t put in the dedication to enhance their technique, their success will pale in comparison to that of a senior scientist.
However, it may be possible that a beginner may have more of an open mind. For example, if a business is having trouble marketing a new product, a young M.B.A. graduate might inject newfound creativity into the project and lead the team to success. However, acting on his own, the young executive may not have had the resources to reach success. It may have been only due to the extensive network of connections and capital supplied by the senior executives that allowed the project to find the success it did. Succinctly, while the innovative ideas of beginners are undoubtedly important, they may not have been made possible without the skills and resources of the inveterate experts.
In conclusion, while beginners may possess fresh and creative ideas, the experts in any field will ultimately make more contributions. These experts have the benefit of not only more experience through trial and error and superior technical training, but the resources to execute their ideas. While the best results are achieved through the synergy of a novice and a veteran, an individual expert will have a much greater chance at success than an individual neophyte.
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 66
- According to an independent poll of 200 charitable organizations overall donations of money to nonprofit groups increased last year but educational institutions did not fare as well as other organizations Donations to international aid groups increased th 59
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 66
- Some people believe that the most important qualities of an effective teacher are understanding and empathy Others believe that it is more important for teachers to be rigorous and demanding in their expectations for students 66
- Several years ago Groveton College adopted an honor code which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated Groveton s honor code replaced a system in which te 53
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rogress will be paved by the experts. If an individual aspires to make great s...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... resources of the inveterate experts. In conclusion, while beginners may posse...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01965065502 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80086754138 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524017467249 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0594433657 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1052631579 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181903522352 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599509335116 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733763240977 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107599236362 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688695594752 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rogress will be paved by the experts. If an individual aspires to make great s...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... resources of the inveterate experts. In conclusion, while beginners may posse...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01965065502 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80086754138 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524017467249 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0594433657 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1052631579 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181903522352 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599509335116 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733763240977 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107599236362 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688695594752 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.