“It’s dangerous to trust only intelligence”
Intelligence can’t be trusted alone without any further consideration. It can be highly dangerous.
In our daily life we have to take actions according to the situation. To take proper actions we need wisdom. Wisdom can come from experience, intelligence or knowledge. We should definitely take advice from people who are more intelligent than us. They can give us more appropriate solutions .That’s why we take expert opinion in case of national emergency. We could learn something new from them. It will help us undoubtedly. Even if an intelligent person falls in danger, he can easily get out by virtue of his wisdom.
But intelligence doesn’t always mean everything. An intelligent person can be dishonest or he can posses a bad character. In that case it is dangerous to trust him blindfolded only because of his intelligence. He may take advantage by means of trickery. Besides only intelligence doesn’t mean everything, experience plays a big role. In a critical situation, if you don’t have enough experience of dealing such cases then only intelligence can help you a little. On the other hand, you have a friend who has better knowledge than you. But he is wicked in nature. You can’t expect any good help from him . Rather he will try to harm you or he can take advantage from you.
This is not the question of being intelligent or not. It is a question of trust and trust is a far more crucial thing which can’t be done without all possible consideration. We should use moral instincts as well as intelligence to overcome difficulties.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-08 | Nafisa Sadaf Prova | 50 | view |
| 2020-08-08 | Nafisa Sadaf Prova | 50 | view |
- the following appeared in a memo from the owner of a chain of cheese stores located throughout the United States For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses Last year however all of the five 53
- The material progress and well being of a country are necessarily connected to the material progress and well being of all other countries 62
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- No one can possibly achieve success in the world by conforming to conventional practices and conventional ways of thinking 50
- It s dangerous to trust only intelligence 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an come from experience, intelligence or knowledge. We should definitely take adv...
^^
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y can give us more appropriate solutions .That’s why we take expert opinion in cas...
^^
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: That
...can give us more appropriate solutions .That’s why we take expert opinion in case of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e. In a critical situation, if you don’t have enough experience of dealing such c...
^^
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... You can’t expect any good help from him . Rather he will try to harm you or he ca...
^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...u can’t expect any good help from him . Rather he will try to harm you or he can take ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, so, then, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 264.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93181818182 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02154126915 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 23.0359550562 48% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4303945557 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 56.6086956522 118.986275619 48% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.4782608696 23.4991977007 49% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.95652173913 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272716456279 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781570235895 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910081430897 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16827360053 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487626581804 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 14.1392134831 53% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 48.8420337079 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.13 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 100.480337079 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.8971910112 38% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 11.2143820225 57% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.