Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of differential education, i.e., splitting students into different classes according to their academic performance.
Recently the phenomenon of "the advantages and disadvantages of differential education, i.e., splitting students into different classes according to their academic performance" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that traditional education might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that differential education can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, the effects of differential education can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that talented students and promoting their academic performance are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the differences between differential education and broad education. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both splitting students and new assessment methods distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, splitting students into different classes according to their academic performance might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the self-esteem of students. Moreover, fundamental aspects of grouping into different classes can relate to the reality that the demerits of the categorization of students can pertain to the reduction of self-confidence. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of splitting students into different classes were correlated positively with communication skills, the local authorities would ultimately address students' mental problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of differential education alongside group discussion methods.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of differential education far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-09 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-05-31 | xiaojia | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | Karie Tseng | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 67
- The illiterates of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write but those who cannot learn unlearn and relearn Agree or Disagree 85
- As most people spend major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing What factors contribute to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers give reasons for 84
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 84
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1207.87684729 152% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27986348123 5.00649968141 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44001570087 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60409556314 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 379.143842365 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.57093596059 127% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0610808007 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.272727273 104.977214359 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.542191292034 0.242375264174 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177712303883 0.0925447433944 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124174157512 0.071462118173 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283303851802 0.151781067708 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129992811714 0.0609392437508 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 12.6369458128 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 11.25 53.1260098522 21% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.2 10.9458128079 166% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.44 11.5310837438 169% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.94827586207 176% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.