Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
It is true that a large amount of edible food purchased from retail outlets and dining establishments is discarded everyday. After identifying the main cause of this issue which is mainly engendered by poor shopping planning, a feasible measure involved in raising public awareness will be suggested to tackle this problem.
The most important factor that drives people to throw away a large amount of food bought from shops and restaurants is their shopping management. That is to say, the majority of consumers do not make plans or shopping lists before picking up groceries for their meals, so they tend to make inaccurate estimates of what and how many ingredients should be purchased, which induces overbuying. This situation seems to be aggravated when sales on exotic products and promotions displayed at supermarkets arouse appetite and, therefore, encourage impulse buys. Without proper preservation, this excessive number of items may spoil and be thrown in the rubbish dump before they can be used.
A feasible approach to resolve this problem is for the government to provide citizens with sufficient information about the negative impacts of food waste on various life aspects, especially the environment. Thanks to broadcasting and online platforms, such as youtube and Facebook, people are aware that food waste can be a factor resulting in global warming and climate change. In fact, it is estimated that food waste decomposing in landfills releases methane, a greenhouse gas that is 28 times more damaging than carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, raising the average temperature. Therefore, citizens who are well-informed are able to make shopping plans to avoid overbuying, compost their organic waste at home or send it to the waste composting collection companies.
In conclusion, due to unplanned shopping, many people waste a lot of valuable food which can be used to free millions of people in underdeveloped countries from starvation. This issue can be resolved if individuals are aware of the detrimental effects of food waste and simple steps to minimize it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Hoàng Ngọc Thảo My | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | nle.hngoc | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | minhtuvn23 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 61 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 96
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same work or the same work conditions for life. Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare for people to work in the future. 84
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.To what extent do you agree with this view? 61
- Some people say that the government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- More and more students are choosing to study at colleges and universities in a foreign country. Do the benefits of studying abroad outweigh the drawbacks? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... and dining establishments is discarded everyday. After identifying the main cause of th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32628398792 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94322158201 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610271903323 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.9544464875 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.916666667 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5833333333 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393249643544 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139889396152 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981469215505 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228083777099 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812857694451 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.