The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph compares the volumes of goods delivered by four means of transport in the UK during the period from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, almost every means of transport in the UK saw an upward trend in the goods delivered with rail as the only exception. Road transportation delivered more goods than any other means of transport.
Trucking was by far the most important mode of transport, with the figure increasing modestly from 70 million to approximately 80 million in 1994 and then rising at an even faster pace during the rest of the period to nearly 100 million tonnes in 2002. The amount transported by water was lower: while it did record a significant growth from 40 million to around 70 million tonnes in 2002, the figure remained basically unchanged at between 55 and 60 million tonnes for nearly two decades from 1982 to 1998.
By comparison, there was a dramatic fall in the figure for rail transportation from around 40 million tonnes in 1974 to 30 million tonnes in 1984, although it did climb back to over 40 million tones in 2002. The tonnage delivered by pipeline recorded a steady growth from approximately 5 million tonnes in 1974 to over 20 million tonnes in 1995, and then remained at this level for the rest of the period. Despite the growth, it was the least popular means of transport.
- The efficient functioning of society is based on rules and laws Society would not function well if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 67
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features an make comparisions where relevant 67
- Some people who have been successful in society don t attribute their success to the theoretical knowledge they learned from their university Do you agree the theoretical knowledge is not as valuable as expected 84
- Surveys conducted in 1982 and 2002 show different pictures of what motivate students to choose a college or university in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.03092783505 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 26.3917525773 197% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 937.175257732 116% => OK
No of words: 230.0 206.0 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73043478261 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60784043953 2.54303337028 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 127.690721649 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495652173913 0.622605031667 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 290.88556701 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 16.3608247423 171% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.5367811854 44.8134815571 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 76.5299724578 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.75 16.8248392259 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 4.34317383033 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172829854016 0.216113520407 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10931453391 0.0766984524023 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732798865313 0.0603063233224 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151260098712 0.12726935374 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078478323184 0.0580467560999 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 8.37731958763 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 70.7449484536 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 7.45979381443 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 8.71597938144 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 7.59969072165 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 41.2886597938 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 8.54432989691 154% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.