Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for the Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
The first steps of Neil Armstrong on the moon was the stepping stone of a dream for human, to explore the space and find a new home. In the preceding decades, space-related activities are the focal points of public attention. An unanswered question in this area which always has been the topic of controversy and brought about ubiquitous debates is the strategy toward the space exploration expenses. Despite the arguments asserting that governments should allocate funds for space activities, I believe otherwise, maintaining that such costs are waste of money. There are several cogent reasons which bear in mind, two of which, present crisis and mandatory demands will be elucidated in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the crux of the matter lies in the fact that nowadays our planet is struggling with sundry emergent issues, poverty, economic corruption, incurable diseases, to name but a few. Indeed, in this situation, people expect governments to spend money on these disasters rather than to try to find a new home for a distant future. Admittedly, it is an axiomatic fact that the earth is not in a good shape. All over the globe, people are encountering challenges that could be solved with a funding from governments. Take the Africa continent as a compelling example. Suffering from malnutrition and unhealthy water, African people are who deserve for million dollars that is spending on space crafts to explore mars or other galaxies. Rarely do they have a future as long as the governments do not put their efforts to solve the problem. It is high time a world code created to cease this injustice and build our beloved home rather than find a new one.
Another salient point in corroborating my stance in this subject is that human demanding needs are the prerequisite of a life rather than space traveling. Although investing on cutting-edge field of science and finding a new home are momentous, but the tangible reality is otherwise. The earth witnessed a population boom in last centuries. Consequently, a rising rate of demands for preliminary goods and services has brought about. As a matter of fact, governments are responsible for emergent needs. Thus, politicians must pay heed to provide a proper tomorrow for our children rather than to invest on a probable unknown future.
To put it briefly, all the enumerated reasons converge to the point that due to the present situation, space-related expenses must be omitted from the governments budgets list. For the sake of brevity, a couple of points are worth reiterating; first, today world's disaster; and second, obligatory demands of the society. Finally, my stance toward governments is to save the present planet rather to escape the problem and find a new home.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the Government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer 90
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should read only those books that are about real events real people and established facts Use specific reasons and details to support your idea 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The personal and work related challenges that young people face today are not any different from the challenges their parents and grandparents faced when they were young 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 663, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ter, African people are who deserve for million dollars that is spending on space craft...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...nts are worth reiterating; first, today worlds disaster; and second, obligatory demand...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, consequently, finally, first, if, second, so, thus, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2307.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08149779736 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85290931849 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559471365639 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7941241146 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.863636364 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86363636364 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197550341405 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525671322485 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485393227861 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120297371647 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547539330596 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.