It is often argued that studying overseas is overrated. There are many scholars who study locally. Is travel really necessary for a better education?
Recently, the phenomenon of "it is often argued that studying overseas is overrated; there are many scholars who study locally" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that studying locally might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that studying overseas can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, studying overseas can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that improving formal knowledge and new methods of learning are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the quality of foreign universities. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both the increasing rate of studying abroad and the importance of local universities distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of economics science, without the slightest doubt, travel for a better education might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the lack of budgets. Moreover, fundamental aspects of immigration for education can relate to the reality that the demerits of the financial status can pertain to the lack of adequate income. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of expenditures of travels were correlated positively with supporting by faculties, the local authorities would ultimately address financial problems of students. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of being a scholar.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of studying overseas far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-19 | sattar_iust | 92 | view |
- You need to study climate change Which aspect of climate change will you choose and why Use examples 88
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors Choose which position you most ag 85
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The first chart bellow shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 67
- Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas in words pictures music or film in whichever way they wish There should be no government restrictions on what they do To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77112676056 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22300448112 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640845070423 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5566203927 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333548326372 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103170110022 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804863989613 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166665376806 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876006790512 0.0609392437508 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.33 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77112676056 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22300448112 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640845070423 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5566203927 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333548326372 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103170110022 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804863989613 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166665376806 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876006790512 0.0609392437508 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.33 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.